There’s a new wave in the online advertising community. It goes by several names – Web 3.0, semantic targeting, and semantic advertising being a couple of the more popular ones. The inspiration behind semantic targeting is pretty simple – it’s (yet another) Google AdSense, just one that happens to be better targeted than its predecessors. Semantic targeting is pretty self explanatory – ads are placed according to the meaning of an entire web page as opposed to being placed according to specific matching keywords. For example, an ad for footwear being placed on a news story about, say, some guy with broken or crushed feet would be slightly counterproductive. Also, with traditional advertising networks there are many phrases or keywords that are a bit ambiguous – like Amazon (as in the jungle versus the online retailer). Improving advertisement relevance is never a bad move. Improved accuracy ultimately means more clicks for those advertisers, and more visibility. So as far as general online advertising goes (and PPC advertising in particular), it’s a step in the right direction. And I’m seeing it mentioned more and more frequently, so it’s clearly becoming more standard than it was, say, five years ago.
To be honest, I’m not a huge advocate of PPC advertising. Yes, it is an easily tracked advertising methodology, and it may appear to give you tangible numbers to report back to the big guys upstairs. Having said that, those tangible numbers do not necessarily indicate tangible results. Traffic from PPC ads does not mean higher revenue from your website. Firstly, I know of very few internet users who actually click on PPC ads, and of those few, even fewer clicks ultimately lead to conversions.
To my mind, the issue at hand is the blatancy of PPC advertising. Subtlety is crucial; decent marketing can produce huge quantities of revenue, but people don’t like being advertised to. The key to successful internet marketing is subtlety, a characteristic which is getting more and more difficult to achieve every passing day. Firstly, internet users have much more savvy these days and are much quicker to pick up on marketing efforts, and secondly, the rules are getting steadily more stringent. For example, the FDA made it quite clear that any bloggers who are writing paid reviews without disclosing this fact to the public will be in BIG trouble. As will those who paid for the review.
So I guess my point is if you have to blatantly advertise your product or service instead of subtly marketing it, semantic targeting just may be the way to go, because accuracy and relevance may be all you have left.
Note: Search in general has been getting more semantic – Google’s starting to look at synonyms differently. More on that later.
If you're new here, you really should subscribe to my blog's
Full RSS feed for FREE! You don't want to miss any good deals here! Thanks!





Sounds interesting. Can you get into the specifics?
Reply to this comment
Interesting. I hadn’ heard of semantic ad placement before (not much of a PPC guy). It’s certainly a good move. Should increase conversions and keep embarrassing misplacements of ads to a minimum.
Cheers,
Shane
Reply to this comment
The theory behind semantics is that it improves the accuracy of online advertising by understanding the true meaning and sentiment of content at the URL level, and matches the most appropriate and relevant ads to that content. Companies like Peer39 accomplish this while avoiding many of the pitfalls of more traditional technologies – semantics doesn’t target using cookies or keywords. Additionally, brand protection is of critical importance. Peer39’s SemanticProtect can be set to automatically recognize general terms that are undesirable, such as profanity and sexual language, and detect phrases in text associated with negative events, such as disasters and crime, which may reflect poorly on a brand. For example, semantic targeting avoids placing a golf-related ad next to content about Tiger Woods’ latest mistress, because it understands that the true context of the page is not about golf.
Reply to this comment
Very interesting!
Reply to this comment
I firmly believe in SEO for long term profitability and marketing effectiveness. PPC does have its place for instant placement for specials or products but if not implemented carefully and by someone with experience can be expensive. Semantics sounds cool and any improvement to the current PPC systems is good!
Reply to this comment
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.I am impressed with the content of the article. I have been trying this method and I have seen some real improvements. This method is very useful.
Reply to this comment
It is SEO all the way for me. A nice read by the way.
Reply to this comment
Semantic advertising is done automatically through Google Adwords/Adsense isn’t it?
I think semantic advertising is old news unless you are manually selling advertisements. (Which I’ve never done)
Reply to this comment
Its great to know about such semantic advertising. The thing which i haven’t applied yet is PPC, but would like to do it asap.
Reply to this comment
Thanx for sharing such a useful information. I am definitely going to use it.
Reply to this comment
I enjoyed reading your blog….
Reply to this comment
Samentic adv is the thing of past. There are better ways of advertising
Reply to this comment